Review your content's performance and reach.

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

The NSW WHS Regulator (the Regulator) has rejected a bid by Endeavour Coal Pty Ltd (Endeavour Coal) to enter into an enforceable undertaking (EU), in lieu of prosecution, due to their demonstration of significant and ongoing systemic failures.

In June 2019, a labour-hire worker suffered serious injury to his toes and foot while working on a mining site operated by Endeavour Coal. The worker's foot became trapped under a scraper conveyor that had not been subjected to an operational risk assessment.

The worker suffered a complete laceration of the sole, multiple fractures, degloving of the great toe and degloving of the plantar fat pad. Endeavour Coal were subsequently charged with a category 2 breach of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (WHS Act).

The EU proposed by Endeavour Coal pursuant to section 216 of the WHS Act was ultimately rejected by the Regulator.

The EU, which proposed a total minimum spend of nearly $740,000, was rejected due to the seriousness of the labour-hire worker's injuries, as well as Endeavour Coal's significant and ongoing systemic failures prior to, and at the time of, the incident. Over a seven year period, Endeavour Coal had been issued 170 notices, including 129 improvement notices, 37 prohibition notices and four non-disturbance notices. The Regulator was not satisfied that the EU satisfactorily reflected the seriousness of the offence, or that it would provide the general and specific deterrence that a prosecution proceeding would in the circumstances.

Ultimately, Endeavour Coal's poor compliance history, along with the seriousness of the injuries sustained, caused the Regulator to reject their bid to enter into an EU, and instead elected to proceed with the WHS prosecution. Such a decision highlights the importance for Persons Conducting a Business or Undertaking (a PCBU) to keep the issuance of WHS notices to a minimum by:

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected] .

Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Australian Capital Territory)

© Copyright 2006 - 2022 Law Business Research